Monday, July 10, 2006

Flag Desecration Resolution

While I was away at church camp, the United States Senate debated and voted on Senate Resolution 12, which prohibits the desecration of the U.S. Flag. It is a constitutional amendment proposal that requires 67 senators voting in favor before it goes to the states where 38 of the 50 must ratify it before becoming an amendment to our constitution. The resolution received 66 votes, one short to keep the process going. That means that 34 senators, 31 of them Democrats and 3 Republicans, voted against protecting the U.S. flag. Can you believe that?

I have heard the arguments made by the American Civil Liberties Union and other liberal groups that flag burning is a form of speech that must be protected. But I have yet to figure out how burning our national flag is a constitutional right. The legislative process has already been tried. But the Supreme Court ruled several years ago that the law forbidding flag desecration was unconstitutional. So that is why the resolution was submitted in the U.S. Senate and amending the constitution was tried.

If you are a registered Democrat, does it bother you that 31 senators from your party voted not to protect our flag? Does it concern you in the least bit that presidential hopefuls like Hillary Clinton and John Kerry voted that burning our flag deserves constitutional protection? I have personally called all three Republican senators and expressed outrage over their lack of commitment to our flag. Thankfully, Senators Coburn and Inhofe voted to protect the flag.

Tragically the party of homosexual marriage, abortion on demand and tree hugging have cast their vote on the side of draft dodgers and terrorists. It is high time that politicians are held accountable for their votes and views regardless of party affiliation. Have you had enough yet? Is there not anything sacred anymore?

5 Comments:

At 10:43 AM, Blogger Alan Paul said...

We live in a free country Jim - go back and check your constitution. We have freedom to dissent and burn whatever we like as a form of expressing our dislike and disagreement with the powers that be. Any time you're ready, pack up and move to China or any one of the Islamic countries and live under their form of government.

BTW: you asked if there was anything sacred anymore? I guess I would name one thing when we're talking about out country - freedom. That's sacred. When we begin forming laws to limit that, we have trashed all sacredness when it comes to the way we run our country.

 
At 3:55 AM, Blogger Christopher B. Harbin said...

sacred: holy, of divine character, set apart in reflection of God.

I wouldn't place a flag in that category.

When appreciation of a political body is enforced and dissent is curtailed, there are larger issues being ignored.

Having lived overseas, there are aspects of America I can better appreciate than others. There are also areas I recognize as problems that others do not see. The flag becomes a symbol for both, not one or another select issue. Freedom to speak to both positives and negatives is healthy for any system, whether family, church, denomination, party, or country. On the other hand, political respect needs to be earned.

 
At 4:29 PM, Blogger BrotherBrendan said...

I think you and your church and your political party are terrorists and desecrate the teaching of Jesus and the Kingdom of God call us to a life of Shalom.

 
At 7:09 PM, Blogger Alan Paul said...

You're a hypocrite. By your comment on Wade's blog, I see you don't love like Jesus taught us to love. perhaps a little cheek-turning would do you some good.

 
At 6:31 AM, Blogger Alan Paul said...

I hear you're good at throwing around the word coward. I also see I have made two comments about your behavior on this post, yet you have not responded. I wonder if there is a little projecting going on with you?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home